Archive | January, 2012

Wine Lists of Shame II: The View of the Winemakers

27 Jan

I was a little worried when I posted the Wine Lists of Shame blog.  I have enjoyed eating at about half the restaurants on the list (thanks to a generous mother and father-in-law) but was always disappointed by the absence of Missouri and Kansas wines from their wine lists.  The thought of stirring an angry response from the city’s restaurants got me quite excited and nervous in the moments before the blog was posted.  Of course my small act of defiance wasn’t in the same league as Martin Luther giving one to the Pope and I’m not reporting for BBC News anymore, this is a WordPress blog, so I suppose the muted response has been understandable.  So far only Bluestem Restaurant has commented and they say they’re planning to include local wines on their new wine list – full marks to them.

The issue of how to break into the Kansas City restaurant scene is a topic I brought up with the winemakers I visited on Mission Impossible I: The Search for a Drinkable Norton.  I also spoke on the phone with Tim Puchta, president of  Adam Puchta Winery  (resplendent in blue overalls in the photo for the Defenders of Norton blog) and in a long conversation he was clearly frustrated about the situation. “It’s a very tough issue to deal with”, he says, noting how on the one hand restaurants have adopted the slow food movement with local produce, “but when it comes to wine, they absolutely have a totally closed mind.  They absolutely do not like to even think about attempting to even try some of the Missouri wines.”

When I turned up at Les Bourgeois Vineyards in Rocheport it sounded like winemakers Cory Bomgaars and Jacob Holman were trying to expunge their frustrations about this issue by playing in a heavy rock band.  The sound blasting out of the winery was so loud and clear I thought I was interrupting a band practice. It turned out to be just a very good sound system and anyway, Cory and Jacob are probably more surfer types than rockers.  Cory sees restaurants as crucial to positively changing people’s opinions about regional wines.  “The service industry is kind of the ambassador of wine, and good restaurants really have a lot of influence on perception of wine quality for the community,” he explains to me in his small office behind the winery’s shop.

Kansas City isn’t alone in generally turning its back on local wine, winemakers say the situation is the same in top restaurants across the region.   But there are notable exceptions to the Wine Lists of Shame, says Tim of Adam Puchta Winery, like Annie Gunn’s Restaurant in Chesterfield, Missouri that features about thirty Missouri wines on its wine list.  However, getting MO and KS wine into most restaurants depends heavily on the sales reps and distributors, who are more likely to push their better known French and Californian bottles because they are easier to sell.  For that reason, some restaurants say they never see any regional wines.  Cory says the answer is to incentivize the distributors and make it worth their while to push the local, regional wines.

But even if distributors are convinced to push the local stuff, Cory says restaurant staff need to be educated.  Otherwise, says Tim, even if the restaurant’s manager or wine buyer purchases the local wine, it generally won’t sell unless the restaurant staff know about the wine and promote it.  “We were in a couple of places in Kansas City for a while,” says Tim, but the restaurants would say the wine wasn’t selling and drop it from the list, “I would say 99% of the time the wine wasn’t promoted or mentioned.” Or there’s a change of manager or chef at the restaurant, and in the change of regime, the regional bottles are often the first to be dropped from the wine list.   Educating restaurant staff can be difficult says Tim, “even though we educate them, we bring them out to our tastings, we go through the motions and their minds are just really closed.”  But Cory says this education drive needs to continue and across the industry.  “Bring them up here and teach them about what we are doing with Missouri wines,” he says.  “All the way through to chefs thinking about what they are cooking and the waiters behind the product.  To really break that barrier is going to take some intense one-on-one stuff.” He says in the next twelve months Missouri vineyards are likely to do some organized industry-wide marketing aimed at restaurants.

The West Bottoms area of Kansas City © kcphotoblog.com

I met Michael Amigoni in the tasting room of his Amigoni Urban Winery in the West Bottoms area of Kansas City (for the full interview see: Regional Wines: “We’re catching up”). There was a tasting in progress and about a dozen people were there to taste Michael’s wines and listen to him chat about them.   With his commanding presence he reminded me of a Roman emperor as he strutted and talked about his wines (but I’m a bit obsessed with ancient history). His location right in the heart of KC has probably helped his relationship with restaurants there.  He told me afterwards that part of the restaurant problem is the difficulty selling wines made from grape varieties like Norton and Vignoles that haven’t been accepted by the wine establishments on the east and west coast and are still unfamiliar to many local wine drinkers.  Michael says he’s the only winemaker in Missouri who, despite the challenging climactic conditions here, focuses very heavily on growing European varieties like Cabernet Franc.  As a result, he says he’s had some success breaking into the Kansas City restaurant scene, but it’s been tough going.  “It’s very difficult, but we probably broke some of that ceiling that was there.  The local restaurants, especially here in the metro, have not embraced any of the Missouri wines.” He tells me as we talk on the long wooden benches in his tasting room.   “They felt that someone would have a hard time paying the prices for some of the hybrid varieties and the other varieties that people are not familiar with and since we brought in varietals that they can put on a restaurant wine list and people understand those varietals, they can be assured that they might sell it a bit easier.”

But at St James Winery the studious looking CEO, Peter Hofherr, told me with enthusiasm that times are changing and the dawn of the native grape breaking into KC restaurants is nigh.  “I think that the wine culture for local wines is changing. We’re seeing some of that now.” He says, “I’ve done a lot of work in Kansas City that shows me that while you don’t see them in the restaurants right now, we are seeing some chefs that really are embracing local wines, so I think that you will begin to see more than them.”

Cory from Les Bourgeois agrees and puts it down to improvements in the quality of local wines. “I guarantee that you could wrangle up 40 wines across the state of Missouri, red and white, that would be delicious at any dinner table,” he says. “I think we have the product now, and we have the reputation on the product.  Most restaurants at this point are really eager, and as the restauranteur says: ‘Well I’d put some local wines on the wine list if someone came and talked to me.” Winemakers say, ‘Well shit! I’ve got a warehouse full of wine!’    ‘You and I should get together!’”

Peter from St James views it this way: “We see ourselves as sort of on a wine frontier here.”

Wine Lists of Shame: The Top KC Restaurants that Serve No Local Wines

25 Jan

A survey of ten, top Kansas City Restaurants has found that none of them have any Missouri or Kansas Wines on their wine lists.  Many of the restaurants say they have the best local and regional produce on their food menus, but the survey shows they don’t observe the same criteria when it comes to their wine lists.  Regional Wine Taster contacted each restaurant by phone and consulted wine lists online and in the restaurants.   The failure comes as advocates, including business associations and farmers’ groups, continue to promote “buy local” campaigns to assist the economic recovery by supporting local industries.   Missouri’s National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) and the Department of Agriculture are among a number of groups who support “buy local” campaigns.   Many of the wine lists in Kansas City restaurants are dominated by Californian and French wines.  Wine producers in Missouri and Kansas have told Regional Wine Taster of their frustration at the difficulty getting their wine into restaurants.    A winemaker in Hermann described Kansas City restaurants as having a “totally closed mind” towards Missouri wine. In recent years, quality wines from Missouri and Kansas have won numerous awards and accolades in national competitions and blind tastings, often against Californian and French competition.  The full survey appears below.  The restaurants are in alphabetical order.

801 Chophouse

  • Website says: “recognized as the quintessential restaurant of Kansas City’s Power and Light District”
  • Wine List Note: Some regional wines from Oregon and Washington
  • Missouri or Kansas Wines Available: None

Bluestem Restaurant

  • Website says: “a progressive fine dining establishment in the midtown area of Kansas City, Missouri”
  • Wine List Note: Focuses on a range of Californian and some international wines
  • Missouri or Kansas Wines Available: None

Bristol Seafood & Grill

  • Website says:  “An icon in the city since 1980…It offers the area’s freshest premium seafood, an impressive selection of wines and handcrafted signature cocktails.”
  • Wine List Note: A wide-ranging list including many smaller vineyards
  • Missouri or Kansas Wines Available: None

EBT Restaurant

  • Website says:  The cuisine “mixes rich heritage with a taste of rejuvenated modernism.”
  • Wine List Note: A range of US and International wines including bottles from Washington and Oregon
  • Missouri or Kansas Wines Available: None (MO and KC wines occasionally present at wine tastings)

Grand Street Café

  • Website says:  “Our food is simple, elegant and exciting.”
  • Wine List Note: Some regional wines from Oregon and Washington
  • Missouri or Kansas Wines Available: None (one MO wine was on the list in the past)

Houston’s Kansas City

  • Website says:  “presenting exceptional cuisine in the most inspired of settings”
  • Wine List Note:  A range of international and California wines
  • Missouri or Kansas Wines Available: None (one MO wine was temporarily on the list several months ago)

Lidia’s Italy

  • Website says:   The Tuscan Grill features “some of the freshest ingredients the weekly market has to offer.”
  • Wine List Note:  Focuses on Italian and Californian wines
  • Missouri or Kansas Wines Available: None

Piropos Restaurant on the Hill 

  • Website says: “The taste of Argentina is very Midwestern.”
  • Wine List Note: Argentinian, Californian, international and some regional US wines
  • Missouri of Kansas Wines Available: None (one MO wine -Amigoni red –was on the list until about a month ago)

The Savoy Grill

  • Website says:  “Dating from 1903, it is the oldest restaurant in Kansas City.”
  • The Wine List:  Includes international, Californian and Oregon wines
  • Missouri or Kansas Wines Available: None

YaYa’s Eurobistro

  • Website says:  “Straight-forward Mediterranean cuisine. Not overdone. Not pretentious. Simply Delicious.”
  • The Wine List:  Includes international, Californian and Oregon wines
  • Missouri or Kansas Wines Available: None

To enter a KC top restaurant for the Wine List of Shame, simply verify that the wine list has no Missouri or Kansas wines on it and email the details to: danjwood@hotmail.com or comment below.


Mission Impossible III: The Verdict on Norton Wine

23 Jan

In Stone Hill Winery’s tasting room, Dave Johnson, senior winemaker at Stone Hill since 1978, summarized my quest for a drinkable Norton in no uncertain terms. “The Nortons you’ve had – and I read your little blog – that you didn’t like, is that because you don’t like Norton or is that because you didn’t have any good quality Nortons?  I guess we’ll find that out when we taste some other Nortons.” A good point made with the aplomb of a wine expert.  Dave, fellow Stone Hill winemaker, Shaun Turnbull, and Thomas Held, family owner and head of sales and marketing, were all eager to try the fruits of their labor with me.  I could have felt a little pressured in this situation, after all, what if I really did hate their beloved Norton grape?

Stone Hill Winery in Hermann, Missouri

Fortunately Stone Hill Winery was the last stop on my wine quest.  By the time I climbed the vine-covered hill towards this winery in Hermann, I was well on the way to answering Dave’s questions.   At my first stop, Les Bourgeois Vineyards in Rocheport, winemakers Cory Bomgaars and Jacob Holman invited me to a taste test they were performing on samples of wine taken from their tanks, including Norton from the 2011 harvest.  These samples were high in acid but even at this early stage of their development they were probably as good as the half-dozen Nortons I’d tasted before this trip.  With a specially made Norton glass (see picture) designed to eject the wine directly onto the tongue, I also tried Les Bourgeois’ 2009 Norton and after a few sips it was clear the sour, tart flavor in Nortons I’d tried before this quest, were under control.  The acid was there but not too dominant and there were some nice, peppery, pomegranate flavors coming through.  So far so good.

St James Winery, a couple of hours south, was the next stop.   I was more than an hour later than planned because I’d had so much fun trying wines with Cory and Jacob.

Jacob Holman, winemaker, Les Bourgeois Vineyards. The vineyard's restaurant is in the background

Les Bourgeois 2009 Norton

Ann Miller, marketing manager at St James Winery, greeted me with friendly understanding and took me around her winery.  After an engaging chat with CEO Peter Hofherr I was in a tasting situation again.  The ladies in the tasting room, with Ann’s help, treated me to a St James 2007 Norton and also their 2008 Reserve Norton.   (Another wine investigator who took a sceptical and amusing position on Missouri wines in this blog, raves here about the 2007 St James Norton .)    I could appreciate the 2007, but I enjoyed the more oaky 2008 Reserve.

St James 2007 Norton and the 2008 Reserve Ozark Highlands Norton

Ann Miller, Marketing Manager, pours a Norton in the tasting room

Ann and Peter kindly gave me a bottle of the 2008 Reserve and a day or two later I happily drank a couple of glasses with dinner and watched my wife and mother in law drink it with gusto.   As I left St James I felt like I was getting the hang of the Norton style now and at least starting to appreciate it’s distinct qualities when it’s handled by a good winemaker.  The overbearing and unpleasant sour and tart flavors I’d tasted and smelt in Nortons before this trip were being replaced by smell and taste characteristics including floral, sherbet, blackcurrant, gooseberry and pomegranate.

So back to Stone Hill Winery.  We started with a couple of Norton samples from their tanks where the 2011 harvest is gestating. Like Les Bourgeois tank samples they were acidic but interesting to taste and an improvement on Nortons I’d tasted before this trip.   Then we moved on to their 2009 Norton which is aged in American oak and compared it to the Cross J Vineyard 2009 Norton.  The Cross J is sourced from Thomas’ parents’ private vineyard and then aged in European oak.  At this point I was a little distracted as I admired the professional swirling, sniffing, tasting and spitting of my three companions and a little embarrassed when I tried to imitate them and my wine spit rebounded a little off the container and landed ominously close to Dave.  They politely turned a blind eye as Shaun poetically described the Cross J in relation to the regular 2009 Norton: “It’s more of a spicy taste, more clove and spice with cinnamon on the nose, a leathery forest floor, in there is a truffle note, it’s a bit more elegant, European in style”.   All I could offer was:  “I’m enjoying them both and not getting those tart flavors.”   My tongue to brain communication skills are not as advanced as Shaun’s but I did feel my Norton education was taking some steps forward helped by his verbal gymnastics in a South African accent.  The European style that Shaun is referring to distinguishes Norton wines from the big, fruity flavor of many Californian and New World reds.   When handled well, the Norton is a more subtle, softer wine that relies on its acidity and the tannins it can get from oak barrels – rather than a Cab or Syrah with their natural tannins – to give it structure.  Dave compares the old world style of Norton to Italy’s Barbera grape.

Stone Hill's winemakers from left right: Dave Johnson opens, Thomas Held reads and Shaun Turnbull prepares to taste.

So it was on to the 2005 Stone Hill Norton.  With the 2005 I moved on from appreciating the Norton to thoroughly enjoying it.  Shaun came up with more poetry:   “It’s more beefy and spicy. Fruits…”  He continued thoughtfully after poking his nose back in the glass,  “You probably get a bit more rose pot-pourri, but not that live, flowery or floral characteristic. Pine as well on the nose, kind of pine needles.”  I asked if this 2005 was like a toned down version of the 2009 Crosss J?  “Yes,” said Sean.  “It’s not so much fresh fruit, you’re getting more of a tertiary age character now, it’s almost more drier prune than plummy. “  Dave pitched in, “It’s starting to develop what I call bottle bouquet and that’s what good red wine does when you age it.  The fruit, the clear Norton varietal character, starts to become subdued and now you start to get some other things that weren’t in there to begin with.   It’s chemistry.” And so it was.  This was a classy wine with its fruit in the background, gentle on the tongue with velvety textures and delicate, woodie aromas.   I was really hoping I’d get the rest of this bottle to take home.  (I didn’t, but Thomas kindly gave me a bottle of their 2008 Norton Port and I drank some of that last  night – it was very nice).  The Norton quest was over and the verdict unanimous: the Norton grape can and does make lovely, distinctive wine.

Stone Hill's 2005 Norton, the 2009 and the Cross J 2009 Norton

Mission Impossible II: Meet the Defenders of Norton

19 Jan

I’m back from the quest to find a drinkable Norton.  The nearly 500-mile road trip took me to some of the biggest, most respected and oldest wineries in the state of Missouri.  On the journey, I tasted a number of Nortons at Les Bourgeois Vineyards, St James Winery and Stone Hill Winery.  I’ve also questioned four other regional winemakers by phone or email, including Adam Puchta Winery.  The striking common feature of Norton winemakers was their impressive degree of dedication to their grape, a commitment that sometimes bordered on fanatical.  So as a self-declared Norton heretic, I was a little uneasy visiting these winemakers to question their faith!  I felt fortunate that they all graciously welcomed me with open bottles and willingly submitted to full interrogations.  The quest is over, but before the results are revealed, here is what some of the Defenders of Norton had to say about why they grow their beloved grape…

Cory Bomgaars 

Head Winemaker, Les Bourgeois Vineyard

Quick Facts about Les Bourgeois Vineyard: Located in Rocheport, Missouri, about 2 hours drive from Kansas City or twenty minutes from Columbia ~ 135,000 gallons of wine made each year or about 12% of Missouri’s total wine output ~ Approximately 3,500 gallons of Norton produced in 2011.

Cory ponders Vignole blends

 “What Norton gives you is a quality wine, and it has this cult following behind it, and it gives a very distinct wine to the region.  Just like Oregon has Pinot and Chile has Malbec - having a wine for the region that gives you distinction is always a plus.”

“There’s no reason to grow Cab here in Missouri because we’re going to make Cab that’s okay; we’re going to get our butts kicked by other places in the world that are making outstanding, world-class Cabs.  Why not make a wine out of a grape that is distinctive? Missouri can grow the best Norton in the world.”

“Norton has some advantages for our area.  It’s hearty, so it definitely can deal with our winters.  It’s also very disease resistant.  Norton is a native species, or mostly native. It has some European parentage, and it evolved to grow in this environment. It is also resistant to most of the diseases so you don’t need the chemical input in the spray as much, and if it’s managed correctly, you can make a nice red wine out of it.”

Peter Hofherr

Chief Executive Officer, St James Winery

Quick Facts About St James Winery: Located in St James, Missouri, about four hours drive from Kansas City or one hour from Jefferson City ~ Missouri’s biggest winemaker producing about 470,000 gallons of wine each year or roughly 50% of Missouri’s total wine output ~ Norton makes up about 50% of varietal sales.

Peter next to a barrel of his Norton

“We think it’s one of the grapes that grows best in our terroir, and so we find it very interesting from a production standpoint, as well as the interaction with the consumer and the history of the grape.  So all those things together really make us want to grow it.”

“We see ourselves as sort of on a wine frontier here.”

Dave Johnson

Senior Winemaker, Stone Hill Winery

 Quick Facts About Stone Hill Winery: Located in Hermann, just over an hour from Columbia and just over ninety minutes from St Louis ~ Missouri’s second biggest wine maker, producing about 260,000 gallons of wine in 2011, about 25% of the total production in the state ~ 25 acres out of 185 acres produce Norton grapes.

“Well, there are two reasons we grow it.  One is because it is basically, right now, the best grape variety for us to make unique and high quality dry red wine that’s adapted to our climate.   We can grow it with what you might call minimum input.  I don’t know that we can quite grow it without any sprays, but you can come very close, and in some years you can do that.”

Dave on the right, with Thomas Held (left), family owner and director of sales & marketing, and Shaun Turnbull (center), winemaker

“Then there’s the history involved.  It has a great history. It is the grape that was the focal point of the wine industry in Hermann before prohibition.  The bulk of the people in and around this town made their living from the wine industry, and of course that all came to a screeching halt with prohibition.

“Norton wines before prohibition were major players in wine competitions in Europe and all over the place, winning major awards. A wine, supposedly a Stone Hill Norton, won the award as the best red wine “of all nations” at an international competition in Vienna in 1873.”

Tim Puchta

President, Adam Puchta Winery

Quick Facts About Adam Puchta Winery: Located in Hermann, just over an hour from Columbia and just over ninety minutes from St Louis ~ The oldest winery in the United States still owned by the same family ~ Approximately 40,000 gallons of total wine production with Norton sales making up about 3,500 gallons. 

Tim enjoys a Norton

“Since the Norton was part of our history, I grew up around it, and I really loved the grape.”

“My great-great grandfather started this winery back in 1855, and we’re currently the oldest winery in the entire United States that’s still owned by the same family and never left that family.  It was the primary grape of my ancestors when this winery was operating from 1855 until prohibition shut us down.  It was the largest grape we had in planting during that time.”

“I think one of the things is, I’m kind of an acid geek. I cannot stand fat, flabby wines and part of the profile we have here is you’ll find a lot of my wines are pretty balanced, but they’re a little acid forward which makes them better food wines, in my personal opinion. I just really like the acid profile and the spice profile that you can get with Norton.”

Mission Impossible I: The Search for a Drinkable Norton

15 Jan

As a newcomer to Missouri and its wines I was surprised and delighted to find out about the Norton, the native grape that’s distinct from European varieties, charmed when I read that it’s regarded as the oldest cultivated grape in the US, impressed by its gold medal at an 1873 international competition in Vienna and blown away by a wine critic of the time who billed it as a future rival of the great wines of Europe.  I was really pleased, nearly licking my lips, when I could easily find bottles of Norton made by local wine makers in Kansas City liquor stores near me.

Before I had even tasted any Norton I was so excited by the prospect that I found myself trying to explain why I’d never heard of it before or seen it for sale outside the US Midwest.   I wondered if the name of the grape was the problem.  Does the word ‘Norton’ sound too clunky and boring alongside more glamorous grape titles like Cabernet-Sauvignon, Sangiovese and Zinfandel? Was that why, despite the grape’s hallowed history and pedigree, it had never quite made it into the wine grape hall of fame?  Could the name be changed to a Latin sounding Nortonis perhaps?  Would that help? These thoughts only endeared the grape to me more – Norton was clearly an overlooked outsider, an anti-hero ignored by the wine industry establishment.   I was now really looking forward to not only drinking Norton but also sharing it and spreading the word.

Buying my first Norton bottle was difficult, almost emotional. I grabbed a few bottles from the shelf and read their labels.  They promised a dry red with inky purple color, rich body and a full flavor.  How could I lose?  After driving carefully home I gleefully grabbed the bottle, extracted its cork and poured.  The wine looked beautiful in the glass – deep, dark red color and a nice thick, almost viscous looking body.   But then I tasted it.  The overwhelming flavor was tart, almost sour, something like licking the inside of a tin of artichokes.   The problem with this grape was explained at last – Norton wine is hard to drink (for me at least).  I’ve tried about half a dozen different Norton wines now – one was even sweet tasting –  and each time I really struggled to finish a glass.  On several occasions the first sip seemed okay but pretty soon the tart, sour flavors became overwhelming.

I understand now that when local wine makers and Norton fans say this wine is best drunk with strong meats and cheeses, this recommendation isn’t wine and food pairing in the conventional sense – at least for the Nortons I’ve tried.  The pairing here seems to be more about masking Norton’s undesirable flavors and making them palatable.  It reminds me of encouraging a child to eat the greens on their plate by covering them with gravy.

I know I’m not alone in this experience.   People I drink wine with haven’t given me favorable feedback on the Norton.   Any locals with a taste for traditional Midwest style wines seem to go for the sweeter whites rather than the tart Norton. The only people I’ve come across who praise it have been local wine makers.  But I know there must be other fans out there.

And a couple of times finding a bottle of Norton I liked seemed to be within reach.  I’d take a sip, then another, almost like it and then suddenly find I couldn’t go on.  I need to try more Nortons and also understand what flavor the ‘ideal’ Norton is supposed to have.  Does anyone have any ideas or recommendations?  Can a conventional wine drinker be expected to like Norton?   This isn’t a heroic quest but Sir Galahad, the knight from King Arthur’s legendary Round Table did face similar issues on his hunt for the Holy Grail.  On his exhausting quest that took many years the Grail would sometimes appear before him and then disappear just before he grasped it.  I’ve felt the same after sipping a glass of Norton that showed promise but then disappointed  –  close, yet so far.   This week I’m driving around Missouri wine country hoping that a likeable Norton really does materialize.  “Ride on! the prize is near.”   (Alfred Tennyson, Sir Galahad)

Regional Wines: “We’re Catching Up”

13 Jan

California’s traditional superiority over other US wine-making states is being challenged.   One of the challengers is Michael Amigoni from Amigoni Urban Winery.  Michael spoke to Regional Wine Taster after an evening tasting at his winery, which is uniquely located in the Livestock Exchange Building, nestled in the West Bottoms, the old stockyards district of Kansas City.  He says the Judgement of Paris analogy made in Kansas Wine Causes Bottle Shock  is a fair one.

Michael Amigoni in his tasting room at Amigoni Urban Winery

Michael includes wines from Virginia, the Finger Lakes of upstate New York, Texas and Oklahoma as “being judged against California wines and exceeding some of their ratings on the wines.”  He continues, “So I think there is some of that judgement, that we’re catching up with them fairly quickly.”

Michael agrees with Michelle Meyer from Holy-Field Vineyard in Kansas that US regional wines, including those from Missouri and Kansas, are growing in popularity in the Midwest and around the country.  “I think what we’ve seen, in especially the last five years, is more of the regional wines getting better.”  Michael says some of the natural acidity in wines here has been tamed and from a Midwest region better known for sweeter wines, more dry wines are entering the market.

Is California’s aura of superiority towards the rest of the country’s wines diminishing?  “A little bit.” says Michael.  As an example he points to California-based juggernaut Gallo Winery. Michael says Gallo’s production of sweet wines under the Barefoot Wine label is something of a tribute to the sweet wine making traditions of the Midwest.

Kansas Wine Causes Bottle Shock

11 Jan

In a video interview with Regional Wine Taster, Michelle Meyer, owner of Holy-Field Vineyard, tells how a Californian wine connoisseur was gifted a bottle of their Holy-Field Late Harvest Vignoles dessert wine and took it to a blind tasting where it faced the best bottles his wine friends had to offer, including a Dom Perignon, a Chateau Mouton Rothschild and high-end Californian wines.   Against this classy opposition, Holy-Field’s dessert wine was the hit of the tasting!  Michelle says the Californian wine fans were “tickled” when the Kansas identity of the wine was revealed and they regarded it as the one everyone wanted to top.

Michelle says the response from these wine fans underlines the  US public’s growing interest in trying regional wines.  ”I think for a lot of people regionality is becoming more important and as that happens they’re pleasantly surprised to find something outside the traditional wine regions, ” Michelle says.

Perhaps today, some Kansas and Missouri wines stand in relation to Californian wines, how three decades ago Californian wines stood in relation to French wines (like that Judgement of Paris 1976).   Maybe Missouri and Kansas wines could use a few more ‘bottle shocks’ like this to help both their reputation and challenge the wine status quo.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 186 other followers